“One verse in Daniel, which by the way is not a Gospel,”
What an absurd thing to say, and it certainly reveals a very, shall we say, desperate way of thinking. Why would you attempt to downplay the importance of Daniel, a book of scripture? That “one example,” shows an angel who is not actually omnipresent, contrary to your claim that spirits are capable of being multipresent (and in Mary’s case, omnipresent). You later assert that you have studied “the Bible, theology, philosophy and Catholic teaching extensively,” yet your posts are utterly devoid of any thing like that. Your argument consists of downplaying scripture, and then telling me that just because you have no evidence for your theology, doesn’t mean it isn’t true.
Attempts to waive the bloody shirt to deflect the argument to my supposed blasphemy and denigration of the Book of Daniel is both specious and desperate. You cannot be seriously expect me or anyone else to take one reference to one angel and extrapolate it to all spiritual beings. Forgive me if I can't take you seriously.
Peace be with you