Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: muawiyah

Since Wycliffe was able to make a readable translation in 1400ish, and since some of the dialects had translations of some parts earlier, there was some capability. Tyndale was forced to choose between dialects as he translated, and his translation and the ones that followed in some ways created English by giving a standard text.

Or so I’ve read. I’m NOT a scholar of medieval english or anything that came before it!


204 posted on 04/11/2013 3:55:56 PM PDT by Mr Rogers (Liberals are like locusts...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies ]


To: Mr Rogers
mid 1500s it started settling down and by 1600 it was becoming a serious literary language with a comprehensive vocabulary as well as a very large number who spoke the standard. But writing is far more important. As much as luther did to standardize written German, you can still find the traditional 35 dialects in full flower ~ but only as spoken languages.

The Dutch put up with the same nonsense. The big question here is why English didn't split up into a variety of true dialects in its conquest of the world, and that's probably because it has a standardized written language with the world's largest vocabulary suitable for any purpose ~

205 posted on 04/11/2013 4:08:36 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson