Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: zerosix

Roberts was basically an unknown when Bush picked him. He had about two years sitting on an appeals court and nothing else. Earlier in his career he represented a couple of sodomites before the Supreme Court. HE WAS THEIR LAWYER.

Roberts is a liberal. A wasted pick by a republican president. Clinton could have picked this loser for that matter. As long as he sits on the bench he will always side with liberals. Saying DOMA is unconstitutional will be his next decision.


95 posted on 03/16/2013 11:12:24 AM PDT by NKP_Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]


To: NKP_Vet
I fear you might be right on that one (voting to overturn DOMA, Defense of Marriage Act) even though it was once upheld as Constitutional and both parties voted in favor if it and Clinton signed it.

Now, however, we have a usurper in the White House and many godless reside in Congress a d certainly a number of them dwell in the Supreme Court.

Sad to witness acts enough to destroy Sodom & Gomorrah well affirmed throughout our land!

103 posted on 03/16/2013 2:16:19 PM PDT by zerosix (Native sunflower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson