To: rottndog; ansel12
BWAHAHAHAHAHAhahahahahaha!!!!
That's really a bizarre comment. Try, if you can, to read whole posts. Try, if you can, to comprehend them.
That's for both of you. Seriously, if either of you thinks I'm defending Law, you're either nuts or stupid, or negligent..
No intelligent being, capable of reading and understanding the English language, can possibly, in good faith interpret my comments as a defense of Law.
53 posted on
03/15/2013 3:37:19 PM PDT by
ArrogantBustard
(Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
To: ArrogantBustard
Seriously, something in my post 20 stirred you up, what was it?
57 posted on
03/15/2013 3:42:02 PM PDT by
ansel12
( August 29,2008 A Natural Born Reformer inadvertently unleashed within palace walls, change ensues.)
To: ArrogantBustard
Yes, you do defend Law...by blindly defending those that have protected him from being held accountable, just as Law himself protected (and thus facilitated) the child rapists.
Why is Law still a cardinal? Why is Law still in the church at all? He has been protected by the church...that's why.
Slandering people who question the church on this as ‘anti-catholic’ is aiding and abbedding the church (not catholics) in it's attempts to avoid accountability.
61 posted on
03/15/2013 3:53:07 PM PDT by
rottndog
('Live Free Or Die' Ain't just words on a bumber sticker...or a tagline.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson