I think you wasted a lot time on this. If your taking it to its logical conclusion leads to "Jesus didn't have to die on the cross.
Your conclusion ridiculous. You're being facetious or scurrilous.
I don't know why you'd spend so much time trying work-up such a dumb view and attribute it to Catholic doctrine. A waste of time unless someone really likes twisting other's views.
It seems you have taken great offense from my stated views. That's too bad, I thought we were getting along for a change. However, they are neither dumb nor ridiculous nor facetious, scurrilous or twisting. Pretty harsh words to use against someone you merely disagree with, by the way. I take great offense at those who would try to minimize or negate the tremendous sacrifice of Jesus Christ on that cruel cross for the sins of the redeemed by presuming whatever sacrifices of men, small or large, in any way help out or ameliorate what Christ has already paid in full. That was the gist of my point. Whatever time it took up doesn't matter if someone at least read it and it helped to shine the light of truth upon a manmade ritual that has deceived many away from the grace of God that brings salvation. I'll gladly do it again if needed.