You said to choose? You said? Really? You can’t tell me whether either man was saved or whether they are both saved. You can’t show scripture that proves which way is obligatory and you demand that I choose one way? Are you kidding me?
Basically, I asked first and you answered a question with a question, which is a typical way of dodging and obfuscating by those inclined in that direction.
So; My post gave a choice of: sprinking, immersion, some other mode or combination of modes.
Do I understand correctly that “combination” is where you might be leaning?
Quit shucking and jiving and just answer the question.
So how is my deferring to answer a question about the Trinity any different than xzins deferral to answer the question about the necessity of baptism for salvation?
Can we likewise presume that xzins believes that baptism is necessary for salvation because of his deferral to answer in the same way that someone else presumes to know my position on the Trinity by my deferral to answer?