[terycarl]

So according to your logic, being the instrument and steward of Holy Writ makes you the infallible interpreters of it, and who could not be perpetrators of fables, and one cannot be considered valid without their sanction

absolutely not, the Catholic Church is infallible because Christ said so....Now, one cannot accept something valid without the Catholic Church endorsement because ONLY the Catholic Church is infallible.

[daniel1212]

D12: So according to your logic, being the instrument and steward of Holy Writ makes you the infallible interpreters of it, and who could not be perpetrators of fables, and one cannot be considered valid without their sanction

terycarl: absolutely not,

absolutely not what? Specify what you are denying. Are you affirming that being the instrument and steward of Holy Writ makes you the infallible interpreters of it, and the indisputable supreme authority? If not, then you are arguing against your promotion of Rome in this regard.

the Catholic Church is infallible because Christ said so....Now, one cannot accept something valid without the Catholic Church endorsement because ONLY the Catholic Church is infallible

But that is based upon an interpretation of what Christ said. What is the basis for your assurance of faith that Rome is the one true church, etc.?