[editor-surveyor]

Your attempt to replace Yeshua with a pagan proxy you call peter is definitely agitprop.

You must know well that you are usiong corrupted scriptures, and that the entire Bible declares Yeshua to be the Rock.

End the pagan agitprop please.

[JustSayNoToNannies]

you'd have us believe that when Christ said, "And I tell you that you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church" the two clauses had nothing to do with each other, so the burden is on you to say why Christ included the first clause.

If you get away from the Greek translations that were prepared by the Nicolaitans, and read it from a direct translation from the original Hebrew to English, you can see that he told Peter that he was called a hard pebble, then the true meaning of the verse comes to light, and it is obvious that he who had been called “The Rock” for 1500 years was the head of the church.

I notice you didn't answer my question. Why is that?

I don’t answer agitprop.

A question is "agitprop"? What a cowardly evasion.

Your attempt to replace Yeshua with a pagan proxy you call peter is definitely agitprop.

You're projecting - the agitprop is your gross mischaracterization of me as "attempting to replace Yeshua with a pagan proxy I call peter."