“Oh, and one last thing, I don’t follow Martin Luther.”
Then why do you defend his oath breaking?
What odd sect do you claim as your own?
Bondage by blackmail.
So once someone makes a commitment to the RCC, they are its forever, eh? Nice.
Suppose someone made a satanist vow before becoming a Christian? Would you demand they remain a faithful satanist their entire lives simply because they took an oath or made a vow?
And of course, expecting the worst since it seems to be served up with regular predictability, the point is about making and breaking vows not about any comparisons between the two groups.
But I do not trust that someone will not try to make it about that to avoid answering the real question, which is, whether you would condemn someone for breaking a satanist vow or demand that they be held in bondage to that vow their entire lives? After all, a vow is a vow.