Posted on 12/08/2012 2:24:39 PM PST by NYer
O...
K...
I think I explained that. I know Protestants have no popes, but in Luther's shenanigans -- both with his "marriage" and his unbridled masturbation habit, -- I see a pattern of individualistic self-indulgence in Protestantism that has lead over time to bizarre interpretations of the Holy Scripture and the moral decay of the modern Western society, gay "rights" and all. Maybe you needed a pope, of some kind.
Of course he weaseled out of his pro-polygamy scriptural stance. I would like to know which were his scriptural arguments for monogamy though.
she claims to define both what Scripture consists up and its meaning
But we do so in accordance with consensus patrem. There is that continuity of hermeneutics, you know. You should have it, too.
Yes, plenty of lay Catholics do not know their doctrines. For that, too, I blame YOU KNOW WHOM.
I got to run. Thank you for taking the trouble with this lengthy post; I will return to it if need be.
Well, there's quite a leap.
CB states that praying to the dead is prohibited in Scripture and someone goes and concludes that he doesn't believe the body of Christ exists.
Nothing like Catholic reasoning.
wow........
And yet...
Galatians 2:9-11
9 James, Cephas[c] and John, those esteemed as pillars, gave me and Barnabas the right hand of fellowship when they recognized the grace given to me. They agreed that we should go to the Gentiles, and they to the circumcised. 10 All they asked was that we should continue to remember the poor, the very thing I had been eager to do all along.11 But when Cephas came to Antioch, I opposed him to his face, because he was clearly wrong.
Only this I want
To know the Lord
Why should ANYTHING 'change'?
SUREly the church did not NEED to differ from what Christ set up; so why DID it?
It'll be back! ;^)
It's merely a Domestic Disturbance that cops just HATE to get involved in.
When an external force rears it's ugly head; we CHRISTIANs will come together, once more, to meet it head on.
Oh?
I'm sure that SOMEONE will disagree.
So?
By the we've gotten to #978; we've pretty well hashed and re-hash poor ol' Mary and her status to death.
My answer...... Both.
It's all about Jesus. Catholics misunderstand the whole purpose of Scripture and our perspective on it.
John 5:39-40 You search the Scriptures because you think that in them you have eternal life; and it is they that bear witness about me, yet you refuse to come to me that you may have life.
Galatians 3:19 19 What, then, was the purpose of the law? It was added because of transgressions until the Seed to whom the promise referred had come.
Galatians 3:22-24 But the Scripture declares that the whole world is a prisoner of sin, so that what was promised, being given through faith in Jesus Christ, might be given to those who believe. Before this faith came, we were held prisoners by the law, locked up until faith should be revealed. So the law was put in charge to lead us to Christ that we might be justified by faith.
Bishop Fulton J. Sheen - "A Plea For Intolerance" (1931)
Tolerance is an attitude of reasoned patience toward evil ... a forbearance that restrains us from showing anger or inflicting punishment.
Tolerance applies only to persons ... never to truth.
America, it is said, is suffering from intolerance it is not.
It is suffering from tolerance.
Tolerance of right and wrong, truth and error, virtue and evil, Christ and chaos.
Our country is not nearly so overrun with the bigoted as it is overrun with the broadminded.
We're all blessed in Christ.
Ephesians 1:3-4 3 Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who has blessed us in Christ with every spiritual blessing in the heavenly places, 4 even as he chose us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and blameless before him.
HMMmm...
1 Corinthians 11:29
For anyone who eats and drinks without recognizing the body of the Lord eats and drinks judgment to himself
1 Corinthians 12:27
Now you are the body of Christ, and each one of you is a part of it
Yes, that qualifies as stalking and playing games.
If I thought that the question was being asked in good faith, I would answer it, but precedent indicates that if I do answer that one, and they don't like the answer, I'll be branded some kind of -ist heretic. If I do answer it, there will be yet another question waiting in the wings with which they will try to bait me into revealing my denomination by the process of elimination and trying to figure out what -ism I am so they can brand me a heretic, as if I even care whether I am a heretic according to Catholicism because that does not equate to being a heretic to Christ.
I am not setting myself up to be judged by Catholics as to whether I'm good enough for them or not. Been there, done that, and not going back. I'm free in Christ now and not going back under that kind of bondage. I answer to Christ and Him alone. The Catholics church is not my judge.
My identity is found in Christ, not a denomination or religion.
Galatians 2:19-20 For through the law I died to the law, so that I might live to God. I have been crucified with Christ. It is no longer I who live, but Christ who lives in me. And the life I now live in the flesh I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave himself for me.
Thank you.
She's dead, Jim...
1000
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.