Sippo, for all his pro papal prolixity, nor you and the attempt to move the goal posts and make a generally accepted canon into an infallible one, cannot do so, nor does he have the authority of such approved Catholic sources which affirm that Trent was the first infallible canon and that debate was allowed prior to that.
Posting reams of Romish responses will not change that FACT, and your idea that he utterly refuted Webster is absurd.
Sippo attacks Webster on the basis that documents by Church Fathers do not automatically raise it to magisterial status, and faced with weightier sources then Sippo that contradcit him, he pleads they were too strict and tries to make the Catholic Encyclopedia and others in error for not defining infallibility as broadly as he does as regards the canon.
When i come back latter i can do more of this analysis.
Let me simplify this for you,dear friend
What you don’t seem to realize is that when the deutercanonical books were mentioned in Church councils and read in liturgy for 1500 years prior to Trent they automatically are considered INSPIRED Scripture by the Church before the Council of Trent, so don’t bother to post me your next analysis.
I wish you a Blessed Evening