Bzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzt . Ahhhh, the judges are laughing their butts off so it's clear that bogus noise is totally and completely stupid.
No one in their right mind would ever equate the Holy Spirit with a "deluding influence" much less spew a bit of inane snark along with their perfect example of ignorance, misinterpretation, and absolute stupidity.
Don't worry, everyone walks away a winner when they play the "Ignorance Accompanied by Snark" game. After such a wonderful example of idiotic personal interpretation, that post wins this lovely portrait of Snarko the Idiot !!!!!!!
Did you look up the passage in your Bible? Do you own one? You may wish to do a fact check here before you embarass yourself.
God sent the deluding influence. Do you not believe that the Holy Spirit sent that deluding influence? Wouldnt that be the Holy Spirit causing that person to fall for a deluding influence?
Here is an example of a deluding influence:
Asked about Libya, Panetta said it was a fundamental principle of the military that you never went in to a situation without knowing everything that was going on first.
And the Democrats believed him, because they WANTED to believe him. I think God required Panetta to make an incredibly STUPID statement, because it reveals to all where the hearts of the people are.
Look at Petraeus. He apparently is saying we denied Libya was a terrorist attack so that the terrorists wouldn’t know we knew they had attacked us. That may be the lamest excuse for lying under oath ever given in the US Congress. And a lot of folks are going to believe him, because their hearts are evil.
I have no doubt that the Holy Spirit led those men to make insane statements, so that the hearts of their followers would be revealed to all, and His judgment will be proven just.
No one in their right mind would ever equate the Holy Spirit with a "deluding influence" much less spew a bit of inane snark along with their perfect example of ignorance, misinterpretation, and absolute stupidity.
Don't worry, everyone walks away a winner when they play the "Ignorance Accompanied by Snark" game. After such a wonderful example of idiotic personal interpretation, that post wins this lovely portrait of Snarko the Idiot !!!!!!!
Talk about snark....
How about addressing the Scripture he presented instead of attacking him?
If' he's wrong, please show us where he's in error. Address the comment instead of attacking commenter.
Of is that too much to ask of some people?