[hosepipe]

[ Other church histories are always presented in the context of secular and Protestant revisionism, which is always at odds and in opposition to Church history.]

I see, so there is no roman catholic revisionism?..
RCC church history is the base the standard?...
So, Anything that disagrees is suspect challenging the standard..
I see where you are coming from...

But I disagree.. BOTH can be in error one or the other..
You are not appearing logical.. or even fair..
I am not here to convert you to anything..
If your historical views are parochial then they are..
I post mainly for lurkers that do not post but ARE logical..
And you know..... not parochial..

OR have not ever heard Roman Catholic Church History is
NOT THE STANDARD.. but just another “view”..

[Natural Law]

"I see, so there is no roman catholic revisionism?..
RCC church history is the base the standard?..."

Church history is the history of Western Civilization and is indeed my baseline standard. However, since you have made an assertion that it deviates from "actual" history perhaps you would care to present some substantiated examples.

Peace be with you