Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: BereanBrain
There is a difference between prophetic language describing the “house of Israel” and practical language describing an individual.

No time right now, so just a quick reply to one thing. "Thorn in the flesh" IS figurative language. Obviously Paul did not have a real thorn sticking into his flesh. The question is what does the figure of speech mean. Scripture answers Scripture, and Paul was a Hebrew with Hebrew understanding, and the understanding of that figure of speech was that it meant people causing vexing, and problems, not a physical ailment.

Your other points can be addressed apart from the point about what "thorn in the flesh" clearly meant/means, as they are in other contexts.

62 posted on 08/21/2012 4:42:27 PM PDT by Bellflower (The LORD is Holy, separated from all sin, perfect, righteous, high and lifted up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]


To: Bellflower

What about Paul’s eyesight? Why was he not healed of that?


63 posted on 08/21/2012 6:10:19 PM PDT by BereanBrain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson