But again, why do you think that the acts of the Supreme Court are driven by reason? They merely provide an intellectual veneer to the decisions drawn on their sociopolitical preferences.
It must be nice to be as intellectually superior as you are. You can see into the past with today’s knowledge and rearrange all the knowledge available at that time to meet today’s standards. Nice trick!
I repeat: I do not think the acts of the Supreme Court are driven by reason. Twenty years ago, when I began the research, I believed that a majority of justices still adhered to their personal bias towards a JudeoChristian form of marriage, in view that the SCOTUS repeatedly UPHELD traditional marriage against challenges up until the 1970s, when Thurgood Marshall and other encroaching leftists started appeasing the underworld socialists and communists ON THIS ISSUE.
Please read the words of my original post, including the dates cited, before jumping on the "you so stupid" bandwagon here. I actually did the research in one of the nation's most outstanding law libraries. Why continue to insist that I must be wrong from the comfort of your sofa without having done similar research yourself? Could it be...vanity?