Go on the record and claim right now that you never spoke negatively of either Romney or Romney’s Mormonism in a religion thread these past years going back to 2007.
I have posted to you clearly that I believe bringing up Romney is not unfair to the ISM, but to post thread after thread on the religion forum with the sole intent to attack Romney is misuse of the religion forum, in my honest opinion. If you or Elsie or Tennessee nana brings up Milt's 'membership' in the faux melchizedek priesthood, this is an entry to expose the vagaries of that priesthood. But you have been using the religion forum in avery different way, as evidenced by this very thread, where the first 100 plus posts are SOLELY attack politics with nothing to do with the religion forum other than the title and Carvile's comments, which have been ignored for th emost part in order to just spew attacks at Romney.
Your sycophants then leap tot he occasion to msicharacterize and try to push buttons, calling anyone questioning your misuse as 'rmoneybots' or 'promoting your man Mitt' or more likely 'not a real conservative' or not a real Christian'. Look at yourself, demanding I take your chosen path of deceit. Sorry, you're going to be disppointed, Colo. I won't march to your drums. You can rant and spittle all you like but I will not say what you demand because I have made it clear why I would even bring Mitt up on a religion thread, to illustrate some heretical aspect of the ISM, not to attack the liberal candidate. And you know that yet you try this little foolishness!