Your dismissal of sexual active popes as not duly elected unnamed popes , and spurious unprovable charges against Luther (as if he our faith), and your reliance on argument by assertion has again exampled why i have ceased attempting to pursue meaningful exchange with you, as one rejected even by your own.
Changing the subject, IGNORING TRUTH, and spitwads are the result of man-made catholic teaching. That is their calling card.
“Your dismissal of sexual active popes as not duly elected unnamed popes , and spurious unprovable charges against Luther (as if he our faith), and your reliance on argument by assertion has again exampled why i have ceased attempting to pursue meaningful exchange with you, as one rejected even by your own.”
~ ~ ~
You aren’t stating what I said and Your last sentence is
false too. I am not rejected by my own if you’re trying to say Catholics trouble maker only Protestants who reject the faith and their own prophets! To your loss. Obvious, not one Protestant or fallen away Catholic replying to this thread can come up with a rebuttal to the message given Kevin Barrett. Silence, it was one paragraph! Another no
answer was on Romans 2:13 and James 2;24, both contradict Luther’s “Faith Alone.”
Recall, you brought the subject up sharing...
“And yet you have the List of SEXUALLY ACTIVE popes”
I replied:
“everyone is a sinner, so what” and a few Popes were not true Popes. Most likely the same popes you accuse of being sexually active. Are you free of all sexual sin in your life, it’s been a pure chaste life for you? See the weakness of your protest.
If you believe one of these, Sola Scriptura, Faith Alone, Man is Completely Depraved, you are a FOLLOWER of Martin Luther, doesn’t matter the denomination/non-denominational of Protestantism that you are professing today.