That is what i hope we can do. I do not think it is necessarily wrong to say one is misrepresentation something if that is proven, or is lacking objectivity or negatively exampling something in the light of evidence.
However, is one who makes charges of posting fabrication, finessing the rules by implicitly charging one with being a liar or otherwise denigrating the character of a person, and who does not acknowledge it when show to be wrong (and the do mods do not intervene) care), not to be reproved for it, such as when as a apologetic he insultingly charges other persons with ignorant misrepresentations (and or ill motive) when that is not proved and the opposite is what is substantiated?
Which is how this last exchange began: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2901874/posts?page=50#50
It is best to remember that posters only use spitwads when they have no ammunition, count it a "win" and walk away.
Firing back - or being righteously indignate - gives the other guy the "win", i.e. the spitwad was effective.