Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Religion Moderator; vladimir998; Natural Law
"Catholics are socialists" is not making it personal. "You are a socialist" is making it personal.

Catholics are socialists, I am a Catholic, I am a Freeper, I am a socialist (apparently).

Protestants are heretics, I am not a Protestant, I am a Freeper, I am not a heretic.

What we're doing here is playing games with the English language and reason, I think we should admit it at long last. Allow me to illustrate:

Americans are ignorant hicks.

Who here would not take that personally? I wrote it and even I take it personally. It's an offensive and bigoted thing to say and if I actually meant it I would expect people to take it personally.

The game, as I see it, that's being played, is the pretense of overlooking the silent "you". "You" Catholics, "You" Protestants, "You" Americans, "You" used car dealers. "You" Freepers who happen to be included in any particular group of people.

We are walking virtually into each others living rooms by way of the intertubes and making blanket statements that we then expect magically not to be taken personally by the persons to whom we are communicating. It defies reason because it requires people not to react as they would if the statement was made to their faces.

Imagine this exchange:

Catholics are communists

"Oh really? People who make that claim are festering morons."

SOMEONE just got called a festering moron after someone else was called a commie. Someone should take that personally.

What makes the whole thing absurd is that writing "You really helped me to understand your position" is ok but "You really make me want to drive a fork into my eye" isn't.

Oh well, thank God I don't make the rules or I'd have you all doing laps.

169 posted on 06/30/2012 4:18:09 PM PDT by Legatus (Keep calm and carry on)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies ]


To: Legatus
Posters may argue for and against beliefs on "open" Religion Forum threads like this one. They may condemn or ridicule deities, beliefs, religious authorities, groups of believers. It is in a town square format and therefore can be very contentious.

It requires thick skin.

A poster must be able to make his points while standing his ground, suffering adverse remarks about his beliefs - or letting them roll off his back.

I can and do intervene to keep posters from "making it personal" but there is nothing I can do to keep posters from "taking it personally."

If the "open" RF debate offends you, then you should IGNORE “open” RF threads altogether and instead post to RF threads labeled “prayer” “devotional” “caucus” or “ecumenical.”

No debate of any kind is allowed on RF threads labeled "prayer" or "devotional" and no antagonism is allowed on RF threads labeled "ecumenical." Only members of a caucus are allowed to post on RF threads labeled "caucus", e.g. "Catholic Caucus."

177 posted on 06/30/2012 7:52:00 PM PDT by Religion Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson