Seeing as you have not interacted with my response in which your fanciful premise of Roman unity and deliverance from reliance upon fallible human reasoning in discerning truth is challenged and refuted, and have failed to even answer direct questions, but instead, taking after Rome, have engaged in argument by assertion, due to your fallible decision (according to Roman reasoning) to submit to and defend an assuredly infallible magisterium, assurance of which is based upon you her autocratic infallibly proclaimed infallibility, then there is not warrant to exspend further time appealing to reason. And who likely is a SSPX or sedevacantist who disagrees with Lumen Gentium (not that this aspect is without warrant).
it’s hard to engage with someone who themselves is the ULTIMATE AUTHORITY.
tell me this, are you fallible or infallible when YOU DECIDE WHAT THE SCRIPTURES SAY?