The benefit of the doubt about what?
The fact is, that if someone constantly extols the presidency of Barack Obama, and falsely makes claims as to the great things he has done for our country, the motive is plain to see.
Similarly, if someone constantly harps on the Church with never a good thing to say, and persistently makes false claims about the Church's beliefs or doctrine even after being corrected numerous times, the motive is plain for all to see.
Corrected?
All I get told is that I’m wrong. That doesn’t count.
Is somebody going to tell me what’s *right* and cite it?
We’ve provided citations to back up our claims.
Where are yours?