How much more evidence of Protestant duplicity do you need? When someone will not accept a perfectly legitimate explaination for no other purpose than to find fault, you know you're dealing with the children of the accuser, and the works of their father they will do.
They are like unto children sitting in the marketplace, and calling one to another, and saying, We have piped unto you, and ye have not danced; we have mourned to you, and ye have not wept.Luk 7:33 For John the Baptist came neither eating bread nor drinking wine; and ye say, He hath a devil.
Luk 7:34 The Son of man is come eating and drinking; and ye say, Behold a gluttonous man, and a winebibber, a friend of publicans and sinners!
Luk 7:35 But wisdom is justified of all her children.
And if there's one thing Protestants have plenty of, it's "children."
“How much more evidence of Protestant duplicity do you need?”
LOL..... It’s “Protestant duplicity” when talking about Catholic Divorce.
Duplicity is pretending a divorce is really not a divorce.
It’s unmarriage in general. It’s bad whether you’re Catholic or Protestant.
You claim there is a difference when people get married and then are no longer married after a period of time living as a married couple. They go from one to the other and are unmarried. Catholics call it one thing, Protestants call it something else. Yet there is no difference - folks who were once married no longer are.
I completely get that Catholics only grant annulments after a process they go through - and one can argue about the Gingrich and Kennedy priority - but the end result is exactly the same. Catholics don’t recognize it for what it is, and that’s fine - but it really is a distinction without a difference - whether it’s a Hatian divorce or a tribunal in Rome, or a poor slob at the courthouse - you get unmarried - everyone recognizes it as that.