Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: boatbums

You continue to mock me personally, I forgive you.

Removing books from the Canon of Scripture is “removing books from the Bible.”

Martin Luther had no authority to take them out, he went
with the wrong much earlier group, saying they did the same. God doesn’t direct heretics and apostates. The
Palestinian Jews also rejected the Gospel.

And who said Martin Luther removed anything from the New Testament? He WANTED TO but was stopped. He despised the Book of James, it conflicted with his false teaching, faith alone.

I would suggest, read the quotes of the first Christians and think about authority.


450 posted on 05/25/2012 10:47:18 PM PDT by stpio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 436 | View Replies ]


To: stpio; boatbums
Martin Luther had no authority to take them out

That depends entirely upon whether the Roman church had the authority to put them IN in the first place - And every argument toward that authority that I have ever witnessed is invalid and circular in origin.

And the point is moot, not only then, but especially now, with hundreds of years of Protestant research confirming it's canon as it is - Luther has no sway in the matter anymore.

Palestinian Jews also rejected the Gospel.

The entire core of the Early Church were nearly exclusively 'Palestinian' Jews, who, by the way, were instructed from those terrible Temple Scrolls which you consider the 'Palestinian Canon'.

464 posted on 05/26/2012 12:43:38 AM PDT by roamer_1 (Globalism is just socialism in a business suit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 450 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson