This is still going on? The premise is that Luther rejected an established, indisputable canon, but which is not the case, as dispute abut certain books continued thru the centuries right into Trent. But as said in the previous post, even being the instrument and steward of Holy Writ does not make one the assuredly infallible interpreter of it. (though Rome seldom interprets verses, and the arguments and reasoning behind an infallible decree are not necessarily infallible)
But it seems that any substantiation that refutes the canard that Luther rejected an indisputable canon are blocked by the RC firewall, that is provided here. But we do not follow Luther as a pope anyway.
“But we do not follow Luther as a pope anyway.”
~ ~ ~
Yes you do, you defend Martin Luther’s heretical teachings instead of the Church.
And who is “we?” Protestants are inconsistent in belief,
proof, you make up new doctrines not taught by the Apostles besides Luther’s heresies so you are your own pope.