“No count-your-change, I am not interpreting Scripture on my own, I am stating a fact.”
Of course. Self interpretation, and misinterpretation at that according to your comments, is only when I quote the Bible instead of some tradition.
You said, “Without these “men” you wouldn’t have Holy Scripture. Man is involved, this is God’s way.”
but whether men were involved or not was never in question only that in agreement with the Scriptures we are not to be followers of men. (1 Cor. 1:10-13)
~ ~ ~
You’re posting my comments twice, I already replied to to
your objections. You’re repeating the same protest.
You have no authority to interpret Scripture and no matter how many times you repeat it, Scripture doesn’t interpret itself.
What question, it’s your whole disagreement, you reject the “man” who canonized Scripture and the “man” who translated
the original writings and the council of “men” who confirmed
the “man’s” choices for the Canon. You reject the God given
authority of the Church. You wish to be your own authority.
“You wish to be your own authority.”
Please, Do try to be serious.