Cynical Bear said one thing when he had previously said something else. What should one call it then?
What’s the correct word to use at FR Religion Moderator?
Private judgment results in lies and error and division.
So...just don’t post whose fibs, right?
No response to my reply, I can share post #1391 again.
Maybe this time?
~ ~ ~
CynicalBear:
“So show me how it’s taken out of context. The context is that the disciples were discussing putting the gentiles under the law like Catholics try to put people under the law.”
~ ~ ~
THE ABOVE IS NOT WHAT YOU, CYNICALBEAR FIRST STATED!!!!
CynicalBear previously posted:
KJV Bible:
Acts 15:8 And God, who knows the heart, bore witness by granting them the holy Spirit just as he did us. 9 He made no DISTINCTION between us and them, for by faith he purified their hearts.
CB said, his private interpretation:
Notice that “no DISTINCTION” between the apostles and the lay? The RCC claiming “without any God given authority” applies to anyone but the Vatican is total nonsense and contradicts the clear teaching of scripture.
Or one of its synonyms that does not attribute motive (i.e. does not "make it personal") such as: capricious, conflicting, discordant, dissonant, incompatible, incongruent, irreconcilable.