I did not one post deceptive presentations and intellectually dishonest extrapolations, and as before, you are far too careless with such charges.
My referenced stats were presented as a comparison of evangelicals with Catholics, and show that the percentage of the latter who are liberal and voted for Obama was far greater than the former.
You want to use numbers and include all Protestants, seeing as Protestants greatly outnumber Catholics, yet even then, rather than Catholics coming out looking good, they voted almost identical with Protestants overall (54% and 53% for Obama, 46% and 45% for Mcain). See table http://www.pewforum.org/Politics-and-Elections/How-the-Faithful-Voted.aspx
You also wrote that while Obama got 54% of the Catholic vote he only received a little more than 33% of the “actual Catholic vote” with the an equal number of Catholics voting for “none of the above,” which is unclear and was unreferenced, and i would like to see it.
You can only get away with these errant presentations in an opinion forum. In any scientific environment these logical fallacies would never stand up to peer or competitive review and analysis. The premise that Catholics are somehow responsible for the current administration is a joke. You need to be clear before making a conclusion The statistics simply do not prove your assertion unless one really, really wants them to. You, my FRiend are far too careless with your conclusions.