You're supposed to ping someone when you mention their name. If you are referring to me as that "some folks" who want to argue and not try to understand, you couldn't be more wrong. Every doctrine I dispute of the Catholic Church's is based upon full knowledge of what the church teaches and how what Scripture teaches is counter to it. Now maybe you are incapable of accepting that your church could ever BE wrong about anything, but that is a whole different argument.
I hope you understand why I ignored your tricky little challenge to us. As swampfox has seen by your responses, there is no point in answering someone who has no interest in the answer and, instead, is out to prove their own point. The Pharisees tried the same tactic on our Savior many times and he refused to play their game. However, if you ever do have a sincere question about why I left the Roman Catholic Church, I would be more than happy to tell you.
I apologize for not ‘pinging’ you. I sent the first comment to you & swampfox. Some how the conversation became between swampfox & me.
I apologize to you again.
But as you are now back in the conversation =
Are you = boatbums = infallible? Do you ever think you may be >wrong when you express your understanding of Jesus Christ & the teachings of the Catholic Church?
It’s been my observation (like Patrick Madrid’s) that the real argument about infallibility is about:
Who possesses the gift of infallibility given by God.
There are a lot of folks that think they are the ‘pope’ of scripture & their understanding of ‘scripture’ is the >only true interpretation.
Are you infallible, boatbums?
It is NOT NOT a trick question. It’s a simple = Yes or No!
I can answer the question = just watch!!!
I gghd am a fallible person & I do NOT NOT have the same charism as any true Catholic Pope. The Pope is infallible as set out in the article leading this thread.
Are you infallible?