Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: BrandtMichaels
No, I just pointed out the inconsistencies that many researchers have uncovered over the past several decades with your treasured radio-isotope dating ~ it is not accurate.

But I'm supposed to believe that it IS accurate to say that finding any instance of radiometric dating being inaccurate means that all of them must be?

That's hilarious.

83 posted on 05/15/2012 7:53:08 AM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh, bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]


To: tacticalogic

Your bigger problem is in explaining the 101 natural clocks [so far but still going up] that completely contradict your one precious method.

How about you start by exploring the moon as a natural clock. It’s current orbit is receding at a constant rate, so how far back can you go before the tides cover the highest mountain peaks, or better yet before the Earth and Moon orbits collide? It’s almost like something major catastrophe knocked it out of it’s orbit or some such...


86 posted on 05/15/2012 8:04:57 AM PDT by BrandtMichaels
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]

To: tacticalogic

The only real problem with evolutionary science is how much bias and corruption gets introduced through government grants to continue ‘researching’ this worthless and godless ideology. Evolution continually presents more outright fraud and fabrication than all the other scientific disciplines combined.


96 posted on 05/15/2012 8:49:22 AM PDT by BrandtMichaels
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson