Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: rigelkentaurus

“They recruited 650 or so Canucks and Yanks to participate in their study. They showed some participants images of artwork that supposedly encouraged analytical thinking – like Rodin’s statue, “The Thinker.””

So - if I am shown by a Muslim acadmeic psychologist, pictures of MadMo boinking Aisha I will believe pedop[hilia is an Allah inspired activity?

As usual, the PsychPerson confuses correlation with causality.

Papers like this one, by academics such as this author, are just one of the many reasons for the low public opinoin of the “soft sciences”.


29 posted on 04/28/2012 10:15:53 AM PDT by GladesGuru (In a society predicated upon freedom, it is necessary to examine principles."...the public interest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: GladesGuru
Papers like this one, by academics such as this author, are just one of the many reasons for the low public opinoin of the “soft sciences”.

The use of statistics overcame any flaws in the study.
36 posted on 04/28/2012 11:03:41 AM PDT by PeterPrinciple (Lord, save me from some conservatives, they don't understand history any better than liberals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson