Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: daniel1212; CynicalBear; boatbums; metmom; RnMomof7; svcw; caww; smvoice

Yes, “Catholic” NAB is horrible and completely un-Catholic. The translation is bland and imprecise; the commentary is straight heretical.

You want to know what the Bible really says, use Greek and Hebrew interlinears or read Douay, with occasional check with KJV. Modern translations are a product of 20c.: if you liked two world wars, militant atheism, wholesale slaughter of European Jews and Russian farmers, artificial selection of obedient coward race in half the globe, and islamized Europe, well, sure, then you might find something to like in the 20c translations of the Holy Scripture, too.


104 posted on 04/18/2012 6:13:39 PM PDT by annalex (http://www.catecheticsonline.com/CatenaAurea.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]


To: annalex

For over 30 years i have been enriched by the KJV (not as extremist such who think the English is superior to the Greek, or not allowing it could be improved a little). And there are Catholics who only sanction the Douay-Rheims Bible, yet one Roman Catholic apologist criticizes them and it somewhat. (http://www.catholicculture.org/culture/library/view.cfm?id=4300&CFID=45541857&CFTOKEN=30609021)


105 posted on 04/18/2012 6:46:25 PM PDT by daniel1212 (Come to the Lord Jesus as a damned+morally destitute sinner,+trust Him to forgive+save you,+live....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson