No, by no means.
That was from years ago when the crevo debates were going on in response to the continual allegations of the evos against Scripture and that it wasn't *accurate* to science. I was just pointing out the parallels between Scripture and science for their information.
They can then refute the Scripture if they want, but then they are forces into a position of denying the science that has discovered years later what Scripture told us by divine revelation.
Science is just coming late to the party, thinking they've discovered something new only to discover Christianity at the top of the mountain when they scaled it.
Whether they like it or not, science is only verifying what Bible believers have known all along. Their problem is, they don't like the source but their coming to the same conclusions as Scripture by the *scientific method* and philosophy does not invalidate or nullify the fact that this information was given us by divine revelation and IS valid.
The other problem they whine about is the language that is being used, but the conciseness of the language, which conveys the most amount of accurate information in as few words as possible, does not mean that what is conveyed is wrong.
Scripture is not wrong simply because someone does not like or approve of the delivery.
For some intelligent speculation on creation and the big bang please read ‘Starlight and Time’ by Dr. Russell Humphreys PhD.
Dr. Humphreys has made some very interesting predictions that have been proven true by NASA. At my local library though the ‘powers’ that be chose to place his book in the juvenile section so you may have to work a little extra to find it.