Replies

"Why not look at the part where he is talking specifically about the Jews. Never does he set himself apart from his people, and the covenant remains final. And exactly what opposition of grace and law, but fulfillment of the original covenant. Israel has once again again broken covenant with the Lord, but HE remains faithful and Israel will be saved through as by fire. “For the gifts and the call of the Lord are irrevocable. Yes, I reject supercessionaism. It is a Christian attitude that IMHO, goes against what Paul says 11:25-36. It is a conceit that has not served the Church well, and in our time has abetted the commission of a monstrous blasphemy."

I have copied this in total because I have no idea what you are getting at. Perhaps you can try again, more clearly this time.

That the Law is gone and Paul happened to be the bearer of that "bad news" for the Jews is precisely what got him into such hot water all the way through Luke's second journal (Acts of the Apostles). The man was hated by Jews who clung to the misunderstanding that the Law represented a means to holiness. When Paul told them it was simply a mirror, a tutor, to explain to them how bad they were and drive them to their knees, they detonated. The irrevocable gifts and calling have nothing to do with the Law.

Certainly, the RCC has errantly taken components of the Law (papalism (chief priest), sacerdotalism (priesthood), sacraments (sacrifices), temples (cathedrals), etc.) and extended them into an age of grace. Jesus prophesied the end of all of this when He said,"...an hour is coming, and now is, when the true worshipers shall worship the Father in spirit and truth...". When the blood was shed, the curtain was torn and the Law (as anything other than the tutor) faded away. But, the modern day Judaizers love their self-righteousness the way the Jews did then. Here then is a monstrous blasphemy.

Of course the law was a means of holiness. It was in fact a grace to the Israelites. Are you saying that what was mandated by God was in fact an instrument of deception by the devil? Of course the intention was to drive them to their knees. What was wrong was that they did not interpret the Law rightly, that they failed to recognize the Messiah when he came. To the extent they continued to keep the law, it did keep them together as a community, to remain faithful to their mission. Paul never stopped acting like a Jew. Neither did the Apostles, although they they had a very different view about it. Stephen pointed out the vanity of it all, but Paul promises that all the Jews would be saved, in the end.

And to the rest, it is ironic that Protestantism has reverted to the forms of the synagogues, with the Gospel now occupying the place of the Torah, and teachers like Luther in place of the rabbis--the successors of the Pharisees (all laymen).