Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: editor-surveyor; Absolutely Nobama; narses
>> “The Catholic Bible outdates the King James version by well over a thousand years.” <<

. Really a misconception. There really never was any movement to even have an official ‘catholic’ Bible until the KJV became available.

How is it that you are so wrong in so many ways so consistently?

You may bruit on about Origen, but Origen did not get the eventual canon correct. Scripture was accepted in a Catholic Council in 393 in Hippo and confirmed in Carthage in 397 and 419. Well, you only missed it by 1200 years or so.

547 posted on 03/15/2012 4:45:26 PM PDT by MarkBsnr (I would not believe in the Gospel, if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 533 | View Replies ]


To: MarkBsnr

I, for one, am stunned at the lack of truth in Editor-Surveyor’s comments.

Sigh...... There’s one in every crowd.


565 posted on 03/15/2012 9:33:28 PM PDT by Absolutely Nobama (NO COMPROMISE! NO RETREAT! NO SURRENDER! I AM A CONSERVATIVE! CASE CLOSED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 547 | View Replies ]

To: MarkBsnr

I thank God that Origen had nothing to do with canon.

But his deliberate gnostic corruptions of others’ MSS made their way into Aleph and Sinaiticus, which were later used by Hort and Westcot in their attempt to expunge the diety of Christ from their Greek NT.

For those that are God’s elect, and have the Holy Spirit, canon is of little impact. Canon is mostly for the lost “Bible scholars” that inhabit the halls of secular universities.


577 posted on 03/17/2012 7:54:44 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (No Federal Sales Tax - No Way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 547 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson