Nope.
I asserted that you didn’t cite me accurately.
There’s a world of DIFFERENCE.
Let me repeat, I did NOT say I was "citing" you. I'm weary of having to backtrack for you to remind you of the train of thought on these comments, but it started when you said:
Sooooooooo where on this thread or where ever on FR or where ever anywhere have I ever said such a thing, written such a thing or supported such a thing? What is WITH all this compulstion to drag every straw dog in the neighborhood into such threads? SHEESH!
And I answered:
How about that you endorsed Kenneth Copeland on this very thread, assuring everybody that he is entirely Biblical in his teachings and the excerpt I posted from his website that says "everybody baptized in the Holy Spirit speaks in tongues"? Could THAT be it??? Something, BTW, that you have not yet even addressed.
I repeat, you post a thread endorsing Copeland's ministry. You praise another's view of his Biblical teaching by telling him he made an "anointed" comment. It started, too, when another poster commented about Copeland's teachings that speaking in tongues is the ONLY way to be baptized in the Holy Spirit - essentially saying speaking in tongues is the only way to know one is saved.
What REAALLLY happened is, it was a dodge - something you are quite fond of ascribing to others - of the initial question I asked near the start of the thread that, come to think of it, you have NOT answered. Are you planning to get to it or will it be ignored again? Rather than continue the "outrage" of being mis-cited, just tell us if you agree with Copeland about the above. Is he right or wrong? Anointed on this issue or all wet?
And, if this was really an innocent thread to rejoice in a relative's wife's apparent healing, then why the title, Kenneth Copeland; Tongues as Languages Not Learned etc?