Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: alexander_busek
I take it that you truly do mean ALL employers should be allowed to require ALL of their employees to submit to drug testing, right?

No, I said they should have the right to do so.....it's a business decision...some businesses may not have a problem with hiring drug users, that should be their choice.

89 posted on 03/08/2012 10:00:39 AM PST by dfwgator (Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]


To: dfwgator
alexander_busek: I take it that you truly do mean ALL employers should be allowed to require ALL of their employees to submit to drug testing, right?

dfwgator: No, I said they should have the right to do so.....it's a business decision...some businesses may not have a problem with hiring drug users, that should be their choice.

Um, I'm afraid I don's see ANY distinction between "being allowed" to do something and "having the right" to do something. They are virtually identical.

So I think that what you really meant to say was "Yes, ALL employers should be given access to ALL their employees' saliva, blood, urine, or what have you. The Fifth Amendment right to not be forced to incriminate oneself should be abolished."

Regards,

113 posted on 03/08/2012 10:21:59 AM PST by alexander_busek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson