Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: FormerLib

Well, the word “pecel”, or graven image was always understood to imply carved, 3-dimensional images, not 2-dimensional images, such as paintings. It comes from the root word meaning to hew or carve, but it is also used in Isaiah 40:20 to apply to molten images, so it is also equivalent to the word “maccekah”, which specifically meant molten images. Also, specifically forbidden in other verses are “maststebah”, meaning pillar, monument, or standing image.

There’s no equivalent prohibition against 2-dimensional art, such as paintings, mosaics, or modern-day photographs. If there had been a prohibition against those types of images, then we wouldn’t have the Bible, since the written word is a form of imagery as well, with the alphabets deriving from pictograms.


167 posted on 03/11/2012 11:02:59 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies ]


To: Boogieman; FormerLib

OK

Not OK

Simple.

168 posted on 03/11/2012 12:18:00 PM PDT by annalex (http://www.catecheticsonline.com/CatenaAurea.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies ]

To: Boogieman

According to your statement, two-dimensional icons are not an issue?


172 posted on 03/13/2012 4:40:54 AM PDT by FormerLib (Sacrificing our land and our blood cannot buy protection from jihad.-Bishop Artemije of Kosovo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson