Actually, I need to amend that on two fronts.
First off, it's just a matter of equating creationism and therefore creationists in general with Hitler, not necessarily ignorant creationists because, point #2, according to evolutionists/Darwinists, ALL creationists are by default ignorant. It just comes with the territory in some people's minds.
If we weren't ignorant, we wouldn't be creationists; we'd think like they do. The reason we're ignorant is because we disagree with them, the self-proclaimed intellectual elite.
They work on the mentality that the evidence in favor of evolution is so overwhelming and so compelling that OF COURSE anyone who looks at it *objectively* would arrive at the same conclusion about the fossil record that they do. Since it's so blatantly *obvious* to them that they're right, then anyone who disagrees with them must, of necessity, be doing out of willful ignorance, in totally defiance of *reason* (also as defined by them).
There is no room for thinking for yourself in their paradigm. The only way to lose the label of *ignorant* or *creationist* (which are synonymous in their book) is to agree with them, since they're sooooo smart.
For my part, I'll believe God over them and wear their labels as a badge of honor.
But I did not refer to the poster as ignorant BECAUSE they were a Creationist - but because they were ignorant of the facts that Hitler was a Creationist who believed in fixed kinds and that his race was in the image of God, and that the Soviet Communists rejected Darwin's theory in favor of a Lamarkian mechanism.
Moreover I found their approach to be ignorance personified - in that rather than actually learning something - they doubled down on ignorance and said even more ridiculous and unsubstantiated IGNORANT things.
This isn't about belief in God - it is about a scientific theory. The dichotomy you wish to set up of atheists who accept Darwin's theory on one side and people of faith who are Creationists on the other is absurd.
Excellent post.