Are there no depths to which you will not go in your attempt to vilify creationists and creationism?
If evolution were all that it was cracked up to be, it would stand on its own merits. There would be no need for the near rabid attempts to convince people that evolution is the answer by vilifying creationists and creationism.
If the best you can do to show that you have something to offer is to attack the credibility and integrity of your opponent or opposing idea so that all that is left is YOUR POV, then you have a pretty poor offering.
Have the integrity to sell evolution on its own merits instead of trying to destroy the credibility of your opposition, and someone might listen to you.
People can see through your tactics. They are not fooling anyone.
If Creationism stood on its own merits the author of this illogical argument of guilt by association and appeal to consequences wouldn’t have engaged in revisionist history in the first paragraph.
Neither has there been much of anything other than a personal attack against me for pointing it out.
Certainly not much as far as the actual merits of the argument.
And this particular argument couldn’t make it out of paragraph #1 without a lying historic revisionist guilt by association lie. The author lied.
And the response to me pointing this out has been to attempt to make it about me personally.
I would really appreciate it if you didn’t try to make this about me.
I will pray for you.