The inherent contradiction is that this thread was NEVER about evolution.
Trolls who are uncomfortable addressing the truth about Darwinism have tried to make it about evolution.
It's rather ironic the way the left idolizes certain people, people like FDR, the Kennedys, Castro, Marx and Darwin are beyond reproach in their eyes.
More guilt by association drivel.
Afraid to answer the question then I must conclude.
You decry Darwin, but use his theory when necessary, say you don’t believe in evolution, but think it happens when it happens at many times the observed rate, and you think a large genetic difference can be accomplished in a short time, but a much smaller genetic difference is impossible even after seven million years!
And you cannot explain your own contradictions!
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!!!!!!!!
In crevo debate (which is not the object of this thread) - strawmen are common. Often, when the "evo" side doesn't have an argument, it raises a new issue and argues against it. It's a sign of weakness.
Evidently, controlling the dictionary is part of building a strawman. For instance, the "evo" side uses the term "Creationist" instead of the term "Young Earth Creationist" but makes its arguments against YEC instead of the many other Creationist beliefs, e.g. OEC.
Bottom line, anyone who believes in the Creator is a Creationist.
We need a "Godwin's Law" for crevo strawmen, i.e. when it happens declare a win and walk away.