Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: DNA.2012
I'm a big fan of Providentialism in general, but I also realize that 1) Christians need a bridge out of the contraceptive mentality and into Providentialism, and 2) there are morally licit reasons to have recourse to infertile periods in a woman's cycle, and this is consistent with scripture, so I don't have a problem with Natural Family Planning (my wife and I taught it for 10 years.) Quiverfull rejects NFP:

Quiverfull is a movement among some conservative evangelical Christian couples chiefly in the United States, but with some adherents in Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Britain and elsewhere. It promotes procreation, and sees children as a blessing from God, eschewing all forms of birth control, including natural family planning and sterilization. Adherents are known as "quiver full", "full quiver", "quiverfull-minded", or simply "QF" Christians. Some refer to the Quiverfull position as Providentialism, while other sources have referred to it as a manifestation of natalism. Currently several thousand Christians worldwide identify with this movement. It began to receive significant attention in the U.S. national press in 2004.

27 posted on 02/09/2012 11:42:00 PM PST by Brian Kopp DPM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: Dr. Brian Kopp

Providentialism has at least a couple of different ways that it can be defined—the term is used a lot in the circles that I run in. I like the term, my wife hates it, but in practice we have concluded that “ecological breast feeding” or the like is what Humanae Vitae is referring to in section 11 (the only other thing I can think of would be that you can’t actually get preagnant while preagnant). Someone who doesn’t breastfeed the natural way for trivial reasons is mucking with God’s plan as much as someone deliberately avoiding fertile periods for trivial reasons—if one wants to cooperate with Providence in procreating, one needs to see both sides of this coin.

While we chart and do practice a fair bit of abstinence, I don’t think we have had more than about ten fertile cycles in nearly ten years of marriage—and maybe as few as five or six (my wife is presently down with morning sickness with number five). God’s providence and our readiness have coincided.

I certainly can’t imagine homeschooling and having a baby every 12-15 months, which is where Providentialism with bottlefeeding or schedule feeding and early weaning leads. JP II has a nice quote somewhere (my wife has it at her fingertips—but she is asleep right now) about breastfeeding until at least the third year. Most “providentialists” that we know schedule feed and are supplementing at 2-5 months and are preagnant again shortly thereafter.

If people want providentialism, they should demand feed—God, in His providence, manifested through junior, wants me to be awake at 2:00 in the morning (actually—God wants us to co-sleep—it really isn’t that bad until baby somehow figures out a way of making it so that only he can find room to sleep in a Queen size bed).

Time to pack our three year old off to her own be and out of my spot.—Nice article.


32 posted on 02/10/2012 12:26:27 AM PST by Hieronymus ( (It is terrible to contemplate how few politicians are hanged. --G.K. Chesterton))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson