Questions:
Was metmom claiming a special charism of assured infallibility, as like the pope (which your response seems to charge her with claiming), or was she expressing a belief, that the Scriptures are inerrant/infallible based upon its statements and attestation?
And are you saying that no one can have Scriptural certitude (and thus believe and speak the same) except by confidence in the magisterium of Rome when it speaks infallibly?
Thanks
On the face of it, I have to question the relevance and/or probity of your questions: at least the one to me.
Simply stated, I’m pointing to what I call the Pat Robertson fallacy.
If Pat Robertson announces God told him something, the only way you can logically claim God DIDN’T speak to Pat Robertson is to for God to tell YOU he didn’t speak to Pat Robertson. So unless you are willing to claim God spoke to YOU, you can NOT logically claim he didn’t speak to Pat Robertson.