Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Jvette; Alamo-Girl
You still miss the point and assume that one who is does not READ Scripture has no interest in God’s Word.

Alamo-girl said nothing anywhere near that. Go back and re-read the last sentence of her post.

If you're going to accuse someone of something, could you at least be more accurate?

1,337 posted on 02/11/2012 7:02:49 AM PST by metmom (For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1326 | View Replies ]


To: metmom; Jvette
So very true - I keep on repeating what I actually said rather than defending what I did not say.
1,341 posted on 02/11/2012 9:42:59 AM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1337 | View Replies ]

To: metmom; Alamo-Girl

The topic was whether or not one MUST read Scripture.

Alamo-Girl offered her opinion on the topic and said that if one has no interest in God’s word, then that is a problem.

I responded that not everyone receives God’s word by reading Scripture and she agreed that one can receive God’s word in ways other than reading it. But, she felt the need to speak again about one having no interest in God’s word.

What else am I supposed to think?

Interest in God’s word was not part of the discussion, it was whether or not one MUST read Scripture to receive and know God’s word.


1,346 posted on 02/11/2012 6:57:28 PM PST by Jvette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1337 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson