Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Jvette

I thought catholics weren’t allowed their own personal understanding (interpretation)?

Isn’t that the accusation you throw at “protestants”?

Color me confused.


917 posted on 01/13/2012 2:14:54 PM PST by bonfire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 913 | View Replies ]


To: bonfire

***I thought catholics weren’t allowed their own personal understanding (interpretation)?***

Well, then you thought wrong. Must be due to reading the misrepresentations of the faith from the anti Catholics here.

***Color me confused.***

Not hard to do at all.


920 posted on 01/13/2012 2:20:50 PM PST by Jvette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 917 | View Replies ]

To: bonfire

You are confused. Where the plain meaning of Scripture is just that plain, Catholics are indeed allowed their own understanding. If the words are not plain and if there has been no official interpretation; there also Catholics are allowed their own personal understanding.

It is only when dispute has risen over Scripture and the Church has stated clearly what it means to the faithful that we submit our understanding to the teachings of the Church.

An example would be on passages that some might claim show Christ was not God. Catholics are not permitted to believe these passages mean that Christ is not God.


925 posted on 01/13/2012 2:35:28 PM PST by lastchance ("Nisi credideritis, non intelligetis" St. Augustine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 917 | View Replies ]

To: bonfire

ooopsie....

Isn’t that some kind of mortal or venial sin?


943 posted on 01/13/2012 3:24:34 PM PST by metmom (For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 917 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson