Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: verga
>> since the canon of the NT had not been ordered by the Catholic Church, and wouldn't be until the late 300's.Facts are pesky things and they keep jumping up and biting you.<<

He was still saying to search the “written word” rather then rely on the spoken word. Facts are pesky things indeed.

348 posted on 01/12/2012 9:04:52 AM PST by CynicalBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 344 | View Replies ]


To: CynicalBear
He was still saying to search the “written word” rather then rely on the spoken word. Facts are pesky things indeed.

So you are not going to accept the OT, Just as the raqbbinical school at Jamnia did in 90 AD. Seriously that is the case you are trying to make?

375 posted on 01/12/2012 10:33:06 AM PST by verga (We get what we tolerate and increase that which we reward)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 348 | View Replies ]

To: CynicalBear
He was still saying to search the “written word” rather then rely on the spoken word. Facts are pesky things indeed.

So you are not going to accept the NT, Just as the raqbbinical school at Jamnia did in 90 AD. Seriously that is the case you are trying to make? Corrected for error should ahve been NT not OT

377 posted on 01/12/2012 10:34:34 AM PST by verga (We get what we tolerate and increase that which we reward)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 348 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson