Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Iscool

You haven’t shown any such thing...Not a single time...
>>That’s what you get wearing blinders. After all, what is or is not Biblical is a matter of personal taste.

If the scriptures aren’t literal, why did God have them written...Practicing a comedy routine???
>>Begging the question aren’t we.

The School of Antioch wasn’t influenced by Nominalist reasoning unlike that undergirding your theology.

And your way of thinking has nothing in common with St. John Chrysostom who was probably the most famous orthodox Antiochene theologian.

The Syriac fathers also were among the ones who pushed the hardest for the literal interpretation of Matthew 16:18, which your sect rejects.


294 posted on 12/29/2011 3:49:53 PM PST by rzman21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 280 | View Replies ]


To: rzman21
If the scriptures aren’t literal, why did God have them written...Practicing a comedy routine???

>>Begging the question aren’t we.

Nope...Just being overly sarcastic to someone who can't explain why the scriptures were written if they were not meant to be literal...

301 posted on 12/30/2011 12:41:25 AM PST by Iscool (You mess with me, you mess with the WHOLE trailerpark...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 294 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson