Obviously these two views on what constitutes the Christian’s rule of faith are opposed to each other, and anyone who sincerely seeks to follow Christ must be sure that he follows the one that is true.
Neither of the two views presented are the true object of a believer's faith. Chasing one or the other immediately places the believer out of fellowship with God for it shifts the object of our faith away from Christ at the Cross.
The 2 views presented by the article are:
1) Teaching of the Church (RCC only), or
2)"Scripture alone," (which alleges that the Bible – as interpreted by the individual believer.)
Scripture alone is brought into the soul of the believer in fellowship with God through faith in Christ and the Word within is then used by God the Holy Spirit to sanctify the thinking of the believer via the human spirit perception of the soul thinking.
A believer who attempts to interpret independent of the work of the Holy Spirit is just as sinful as one seeking anything other than God.
Sola Scriptura doesn't promote independent interpretation. It instead emphasizes the believer must continually remain in fellowship with God through faith in Christ, allowing God the Holy Spirit to perform His work on the believer.
Scripture is one of the best sources to find the Word of God.
“The 2 views presented by the article are:
1) Teaching of the Church (RCC only), or
2)”Scripture alone,” (which alleges that the Bible – as interpreted by the individual believer.)”
False. The article does not claim, nor does the Church believe, that the teachings of the Church alone are what constitutes the rule of faith.