Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: RegulatorCountry; boatbums; metmom; RnMomof7
The Church considers Paul as the second greatest of the Apostles after Peter; for example my home church and school growing up was named Sts. Peter and Paul. The Church has no problem with Paul whatsoever; the Catechism references Paul throughout.

Glad to hear it, since it has been made evident on this thread and others that many do not follow their own church in holding the Apostle Paul to such a level of esteem.

What many do not understand is that Paul saved the fledgling Church by peddling it to the Greeks. Paul was all things to all men and convinced much of the world to accept the new Faith.

I've seen FReepers use the term "Paulician" derogatorily more times than I can count. I've even seen the particularly risible "Paulistinians" more than once.

Google is your friend. Check out first millennium Paulian heresies for fun and amusement. That is to what we refer.

Now, who would do such a thing, lol?

I refer with derision to those to whom proclaim the "gospel of Paul" as opposed to the Gospel of Christ. We believe that Paul did not proclaim a different Gospel. I have been sternly instructed that Paul is the successor of Christ and has more truth in his epistles than in the Gospels. I have been sternly instructed that Paul is the only instructor to the Gentiles and Jesus was only to the Jews.

That is the message that all true Christians will reject.

321 posted on 12/24/2011 10:16:10 AM PST by MarkBsnr (I would not believe in the Gospel, if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 320 | View Replies ]


To: MarkBsnr; word_warrior_bob; Judith Anne
... just as there were heretics who rejected Paul, correct? The Ebionites.

A very fine line has been being ridden on FR for years, deriding Protestants for relying upon the Pauline Epistles a great deal, as if there is anything remiss in so doing. That fine line has been breached on occasion, one of which is admitted and documented, going into the outright heresy of rejecting the Apostle Paul, which is what was referred to upthread and for which I have received so many false accusations.

It appears that all the hatred endured has paid off, with retraction by all responsible parties present, and so I thank you.

Case closed. Merry Christmas!

322 posted on 12/24/2011 10:30:53 AM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 321 | View Replies ]

To: MarkBsnr

>>>>>I refer with derision to those to whom proclaim the “gospel of Paul” as opposed to the Gospel of Christ. We believe that Paul did not proclaim a different Gospel. I have been sternly instructed that Paul is the successor of Christ and has more truth in his epistles than in the Gospels. I have been sternly instructed that Paul is the only instructor to the Gentiles and Jesus was only to the Jews.

Same here. Agreed.


323 posted on 12/24/2011 2:30:29 PM PST by Judith Anne (For rhe sake of His sorrowful passion, have mercy on us, and on the whole world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 321 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson