The other issues with Paul are simply a deflection from what I called Regulator Country out on.
He said he saw Catholics(plural) call Paul crazy, which would have been impossible since only one poster had issue with Paul.
I knew eventually this one posters opinion would fraudulently be peddled as what Catholics believe by some nefarious posters on this forum.
That is what has happened (more than once). So I’m asking Regulator AGAIN.
Were you just repeating this untruth that you saw someone else post or were you on the original thread in question?
Since I’ve asked multiple times and haven’t gotten an answer the answer is pretty obvious. I have gotten an answer which was the equivalent of “Mommy she started it” or “Why don’t you yell at her, did you see what she said?”
But no denial or clarification about how and why this blatant untruth was posted.
What kind of “Christians” would knowingly misrepresent what they knew was one persons opinion and try to insinuate that it was a more widely held “Catholic” position?
Just to bring this back down to earth, I'm going to remind everyone of the statement I wrote, from which an entire, lurid fantasy scenario has been spun:
No, I refer directly to replies by FR Catholics to the Religion Forum over the past year or two, calling the Apostle Paul crazy and denigrating the value of the books of the Bible written by him.
You're in my opinion being very disingenuous. The above statement is true. It remains true even under the strained parsing to which you've subjected it.
Now, if you all would care to cease with the breathless, negative adjectives, the personal accusations, the weird sexual innuendo and the mind reading, maybe this thread will survive the night. Or, maybe that's the objective, attempting to get the thread pulled.
It's certainly happened often enough at the behest of members of your group in the past.