Apparently you think the evolutionary ‘scientific models’ are closest to reality just because nothing else is so highly researched [read gov funded]. The problem is any contradictory data consistently gets overlooked and ignored while ridiculing anyone willing to ask you to show all the steps in your ridiculous conclusions.
Evolution fails at the ‘mathematical model’ level and therefore evolution fails at reality.
The theory of evolution through natural selection of genetic variation is a very helpful theory in that it explains and predicts data.
If I take a bacteria and plate it on ten different plates and subject those plates to ten different stresses - using the theory I can predict the outcome.
Can you predict the outcome?
When a novel antibiotic is introduced the theory of natural selection of genetic variation can predict what will happen in bacterial populations subject to the novel antibiotic.
Can you predict the outcome?
Mathematically what is going to PREVENT genetic variations from accumulating within a population and differential reproductive outcomes ‘selecting’ for or against these variations?